கட்டப் பஞ்சாயத்து.

You may also like...

25 Responses

  1. Mugnthan says:

    அருமையான கட்டுரை.முன்னர் இருந்த படியே வரலாறு திருத்தி அமைக்க முடியுமா?அதற்கு எந்த வருடம் என்று அமைத்துக்கொள்ளமுடியுமா?அசோக மன்னரின் ஸ்தூபிகள் இடிக்கப்பட்டு இந்து கோவில்கள் கட்டினார்களே…திருப்பியும் அந்தகாலத்திற்கு செல்லமுடியுமா?

  2. Anonymous says:

    அருமையான கட்டுரை.முன்னர் இருந்த படியே வரலாறு திருத்தி அமைக்க முடியுமா?அதற்கு எந்த வருடம் என்று அமைத்துக்கொள்ளமுடியுமா?அசோக மன்னரின் ஸ்தூபிகள் இடிக்கப்பட்டு இந்து கோவில்கள் கட்டினார்களே…திருப்பியும் அந்தகாலத்திற்கு செல்லமுடியுமா?

  3. Gideon jenith says:

    இனிமேல் நான் வீடு கட்டும் போது கட்டப்படும் கட்டிடத்திற்கு கீழே மண்டையோடுகளோ பொம்மைகளோ சானிடரி நாப்கின் போன்ற இத்யாதிகள் எதுவும் காணப்படவில்லை என பில்டிங் அப்ரூவல் வாங்கும் போது கேட்கபோறேன்..

    இப்பவே பயமா இருக்ு சாமி

  4. Acharya says:

    ஒரு வரலாற்று தவறு சரி செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது. In 1951, Muslims were 9.2% of Total. Hindus were 85%. Today 17% Muslims, while Hindus are at 75%. What Mughal empire did not acheive was achieved in Sonia Congress rule. It is high stop this so that Hinduism is savrd. Jai Hind..

  5. Acharya says:

    In 1951, Muslims were 9.2% of Total. Hindus were 85%. Today 17% Muslims, while Hindus are at 75%. What Mughal empire did not acheive was achieved in Sonia Congress rule. It is high stop this so that Hinduism is savrd. Jai Hind..

  6. Prem says:

    Seeman also condemned this judgement but you have mentioned as if only 2 seats joker thiruma has condemned this…

    yen ya savukku unnaku ivalo complex

    • Sherra says:

      Savuku Ku sattam theriyum… Athanalthan notta vuku keela pogum seeman sona karuthai suttikatala…athula satta kuraipadu iruku…

  7. Prem says:

    //தீர்ப்பு குறித்து பேசிய, முன்னாள் ஐஏஎஸ் அதிகாரி ஒருவர், இவ்வாறு கூறினார்.//

    Unn macchan Sashikaanth thaane 😀

  8. Kailash says:

    Will the strategy be followed in Criminal case of Babri Masjid Demolition which is nearing judgement ? Will they quote same Article 142 to free the culprits or will they punish the culprits who paved the way for Riots through out country ?

  9. முகில் says:

    உண்மையை சொல்ல தற்போது பயமாக உள்ள நிலையில் தங்களின் கருத்துகள் நன்று மதங்களை தோற்றுவித்த மகான்கள் யாரும் தம் மதம் மட்டும் சிறந்தது என கருதவில்லை கடவுள் என்று ஓன்று இருந்தால் அதனை அடைய பல வழிகளில் ஓருவழியே என கூறினர்

  10. முத்துராமலிங்கம் says:

    இஸ்லாமியர்கள் வந்தேறிகளே என்று குறிப்பிட்டிருக்கிறீர்கள் – அது திருத்தப்பட வேண்டும் அல்லவா? மற்றபடி – நல்ல பார்வை

    • Venkat says:

      Sir, almost 90% of Indian Muslims are converted from Hinduism by 15th century. Never call them as “வந்தேறி”. Same rule applies to today’s Christians too.

  11. Shajahan says:

    தெளிவான கட்டுறை. இந்த தீர்ப்பு கட்டப்பஞ்சாயத்தே. எந்த நடுநிலையாளரும் இதை ஏற்க மாட்டார்.

  12. Anonymous says:

    உண்மையை உறக்க சொன்ன பதிவு நன்றி சவுக்கு சங்கர் அவர்களுக்கு#வாழ்த்துக்கள்

  13. sundar says:

    archeological survey of india has clearly said there was some temple earlier on which only mosque has come .

    It is well known to every one how muslim invaders demolished Hindu temples in that period .

    Muslim invaders were involved in demolishing looting hindu temples even in south including srirangam , tanjavur temples etc . many travellers in that era has mentioned that the hindus worshipeed Lord Rama in that period before Babar built mosque in late 1550s .

    Mosque was not built on vacant land .

    That means it was built on a foundation after demolishing Hindu temple only .

    Supreme court has given the best judgement .

    • Savukku says:

      Please read the judgment. Nowhere ASI said, there was temple.

      • Eesan says:

        Did u see the interview by ASI director KK Muhammed. You would have seen it, but conveniently ignored as it is not in your favour. See the last para in the judgement.
        “170. It is thus concluded on the conclusion that faith and belief of Hindus since prior to construction of Mosque and subsequent thereto has always been that Janmaasthan of Lord Ram is the place where Babri Mosque has been constructed which faith and belief is proved by documentary and oral evidence discussed above”
        Not mere faith and belief – it is proved with documentary and oral evidence. So stop propagating that the judgement has been given on faith and belief.
        “167. The statements noted in all Gazetteers as noticed above published under authority of government categorically and unanimously state that at Janmasthan of Lord Ram, Babri Mosque was constructed in 1528 by Babar. It is true that statements recorded in Gazette is not conclusive evidence but presumption of correctness of statements recorded have to be raised subject to being disproved by leading appropriate evidences. All Gazettes published by the Government authority repeats the same statement that Babri Mosque was constructed at the Janmasthan of Lord Ram. There is no evidence worth name led of the plaintiffs of Suit No.4 to disprove the above statement and further, oral evidence as noticed above clearly supports the faith and belief of Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the place where Babri Mosque has been constructed. The conclusion that place of birth of Lord Ram is the three dome structure can, therefore, be reached”
        I think you have not read the judgement. It is available in the supreme court website. Please go through that.
        Also what Rajeev Dhavan did on the last day by tearing the map submitted as evidence shows that he has the least respect for the court and his arrogant attitude. Had the same thing done by Mr.Prasaran, you self proclaimed liberals would have jumped. Shame that you are trying to justify his act.
        Whenever a judgement comes in favor of self proclaimed liberals, then Supreme court is great, if not then it is bad. When Supreme court convicted JJ and Sasikala, varey va, – supreme court is great. Stop this losers talk henceforth. When CJI Gogoi and justice chandrachud gave a press conference along with 2 more judges, you guys made them a hero. Now if you dont like their judgement they become zeros?

      • Venkat says:

        Savukku Shankar ,

        Happy to see your response in Comments. You mentioned ASI has never mentioned temple was there. What as per you is temple structure ? In South India itself , if you see Tamilnadu alone, you can see different type of temples based on the culture of King who built it. If you take Kerala, you wont see high rise temples across. Not sure if you visited Kasi, same applies. In that prospective ,Judgement mentioned that a building existed there belong to 12th century and it is not reflecting Islamic Culture or Mosque. If you believe the Mosque was built in 15th century based on ASI’s reports, you need to believe this too.

        I have been requesting you for quiet a while on various things including Navodaya schools in Tamilnadu. Not sure why it was never acknowledged. We dont want to criticize you in your blog, but you write articles which is of not related to scams or public problems. You lose your creditability earned over many years from your viewers through this kind of things.

    • Anonymous says:

      Merely telling the history is not need.we all are know that then where is the evidence of ASI telling some temple debris are there.would u like to share.

      • Anonymous says:

        Below is a fitting reply.

        You mentioned ASI has never mentioned temple was there. What as per you is temple structure ? In South India itself , if you see Tamilnadu alone, you can see different type of temples based on the culture of King who built it. If you take Kerala, you wont see high rise temples across. Not sure if you visited Kasi, same applies. In that prospective ,Judgement mentioned that a building existed there belong to 12th century and it is not reflecting Islamic Culture or Mosque. If you believe the Mosque was built in 15th century based on ASI’s reports, you need to believe this too.

  14. சம்பத் says:

    😢

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.